The argument that the U.S. election will have Brexit-like effects and that investors should invest heavily in a major market dip should be approached with caution, economist Mohamed El-Erian told CNBC on Monday.
“I would caution about the Brexit argument. The Brexit argument is go in there immediately because it will bounce back fully. Be careful, this is a little bit different,” El-Erian said. “The U.S. is systemically much more important than Britain is and there’s lots of other uncertainties.”
Instead, El-Erian, chief economic advisor at Allianz, recommends a more cautious approach if there were a sweep for either side, which would counter the widely held prediction of a Hillary Clinton win with Congress remaining in gridlock.
“I would deploy capital slowly. I wouldn’t go all in on Wednesday morning after a big loss if there was a sweep one way or the other,” he told “Squawk Box.”
A sweep, El-Erian continued, could warrant a market overreaction. The market would likely open lower and generate buying opportunities, he said, causing “more popular names” to sell off quickly.
Overall, the key, according to El-Erian, is to have cash on hand and be cautious in responding to market movements.
This article is for general information purposes only. It is not investment advice or a solution to buy or sell securities. Opinions are the authors; not necessarily that of OANDA Corporation or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers or directors. Leveraged trading is high risk and not suitable for all. You could lose all of your deposited funds.