Australia’s mining tax was upheld as legal today by the country’s highest court in a defeat for Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. (FMG) and state governments that challenged its validity.
The High Court of Australia’s full bench unanimously dismissed the challenge, ruling the tax “did not discriminate between states and that the acts did not give preference to one state over another,” according to a summary of the ruling posted on the court’s website.
Fortescue, Australia’s third-biggest iron-ore producer, sued in the nation’s highest court in June 2012 to nullify the Minerals Resource Rent Tax, with the backing of the governments of Queensland and Western Australia, claiming the levy was discriminatory.
The tax on iron-ore and coal profits, introduced by former Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s government, will raise A$600 million ($538 million) in the current fiscal year, according to Treasury forecasts released last week. That’s down from the A$4 billion projected by Treasury in May 2011, as slumping commodity prices on weaker Chinese demand curb mining profits.
Opposition leader Tony Abbott has promised to repeal the tax should his coalition win the federal election set for Sept. 7, saying the revenue shortfall is an example of the government’s failure to manage the $1.5 trillion economy.
The mining tax, designed by Gillard and then Treasurer Wayne Swan, has drawn criticism from mining companies, state governments aligned with the Liberal-National opposition and billionaire Gina Rinehart, Asia’s richest woman.
This article is for general information purposes only. It is not investment advice or a solution to buy or sell securities. Opinions are the authors; not necessarily that of OANDA Corporation or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers or directors. Leveraged trading is high risk and not suitable for all. You could lose all of your deposited funds.